Thursday, June 19, 2008

Traffic woes, the scariest thing I saw today, a posthumous 'thank you', and anything else I feel like rambling on about...

How's that for a needlessly long title? (my inquisitive mind just did a google search for "guinness record longest title" and came up with this:

The longest title of a book is 1,433 characters (290 words) and was written by Davide Ciliberti (Italy) in July 2007. The book describes the idiosyncrasies of the PR world. The full title is "Per favore dite a mia madre che faccio il pubblicitario lei pensa che sono un pierre e che quindi regalo manciate di free entry e consumazioni gratis a chi mi pare, rido coi vips, i calciatori le veline e le giornaliste, leggo Novella e mi fotografano i paparazzi, entro neI privé saltando la coda, bevo senza pagare, sono ghiotto di tartine e gin tonic, ho la casa piena di oggetti di design, conosco Paris Hilton, Tom Ford ed Emilio"


Nope, I don't know what that means either. Wow... I sidetracked myself during the first sentence. That doesn't bode well for this post, now, does it? :-)

First things first, let's deal with old business. Hillary Clinton. Thank you for bowing out of the race when you did and in the manner in which you did so. Sorry for all the crap I gave you during your campaign (okay, not really). I wish you would have dropped out sooner, but I can respect your decision to stay. However, I think the damage you caused is minimal, and your former rival, Barack Obama, remains in good shape. I expect the Democrats to thoroughly trounce McCain in November.

---

So earlier today I stepped outside my office for a smoke break, watching traffic pass by as I puffed away (I know, it sounds about as exciting as watching paint dry, but I find that it's good for thinking. Besides, I'm a people watcher.), and I for some reason this beat up, bronze-ish colored mini-van catches my eye. I look up to see the driver with his head bowed and his hands in front of him as if praying, as he drove by. Please note that as he was driving and praying, his hands were several inches away from the steering wheel. That's right... the guy was deep in prayer, while driving, with his hands off the wheel, and his head bowed (couldn't tell if his eyes were closed, but he definitely wasn't looking up at the road). Scary. I hope the car in front of him was praying, too.

---

Speaking of stupid drivers, the other day I'm headed home from work, and I'm on a freeway on-ramp getting ready to merge into traffic. The guy in front of me merges smoothly as I check my mirrors and see that the lane is clear, yet, in the distance, I noticed a red vehicle in my lane, but he was far enough back that I could slip right in without causing anybody to slow down. Well, except for this guy. We're merging, and I look again in my mirror and the red vehicle is noticeably closer. The guy is going way too fast. I'm in the lane already, flowing with traffic (albeit relatively slowly) and this guy is still speeding towards me, slowing down rather suddenly, uncomfortably close to my own vehicle. I'm watching the guy closely in my rear view mirror, and apparently a driver behind the guy in the red vehicle, whom I'll just call Red from now on, came to a similarly sudden slowdown behind Red, presumably because Red himself slowed down rather suddenly.

So instead of everybody just moving on with their day, Red is looking in his own rear view mirror freaking out. His arms are flailing, he's screaming and throwing a fit, apparently because it looked like the guy was going to hit Red (but he didn't). Fine, Red wants to throw a hissy fit while ignoring the fact that he did the exact same thing to me just a few seconds earlier, let him. I just wanted to gt home. But the tantrum continued for several more seconds. Then it stopped, and it looked like he regained his composure. But I was wrong, because a moment later he starts up with the tantrum again, flailing arms and all.

It was quiet the site to behold, I must say. Like watching an angry two year old, except much taller and behind the wheel of a moving vehicle (a beat up lil' pick up truck, dropped down so low that he'd bottom out completely if he hit a pothole). So as he continued his little display for a few more seconds, it (believe it or not) got even more heated, and the next thing I knew, Red, who was driving, mind you, has half of his body out the window as he's turned backwards to face the car behind him, yelling and screaming and continuing with the flailing arm thing. My amusement turned to shock as I instantly realized that if he's facing the guy behind him, he's not looking at me, and the car in front of me was coming to a stop as we reached a traffic bottleneck. Red's still yelling, I'm preparing to stop myself, hoping that Red gets his act together, and there's really nowhere for me to go as I've got traffic on my left, and a guardrail on my right. Fortunately, Red swerved into the next lane at literally the last second, and sped off, darting in and out of traffic, never to be seen again. Hopefully.

What a prick.

---

While we're talking about traffic (wow, two fairly decent segues in a row!), caught this in the news today: Honolulu’s traffic among worst in U.S..

To be exact, we ranked 38th out of 100. The article goes on to say how Thursday afternoons from 5:00 pm to 6:00 pm are the worst, and that residents spend about 40 hours a week in traffic (which would breakdown to 8 hours a day: 4 hours in the morning and 4 in the afternoon, I presume). That last figure alarmed me. 40 hours? Really? They don't explain exactly how they came about that figure. I know of people who have 2 hour commutes to work, perhaps even longer if they have to drop off their kids at school/babysitter, or run some other errand as part of their morning routine, but 40 hours a week sounded rather dubious.

With that said, though, traffic in Hawaii is really bad. I've lived in a number of locales around the island, and no matter where you are, if you're trying to get into Honolulu in the morning, you're screwed. I remember when I used to live in the Makiki area of Honolulu, it would sometimes take me 45 minutes to get to the Iwilei area, which is only about 4 miles, if my memory is correct. Four miles in 45 minutes. Ouch. That's why I mostly took the bus when I lived there. When I lived in Aiea, which is about 8-10 miles from Honolulu, it took me anywhere from 45 minutes to 1 hour and 15 minutes. Fortunately I now live in Kaneohe, which is about 12 miles from where I work. Yes, it's probably the farthest I've lived from any workplace, but a) the drive is so green and beautiful and mostly free of stoplights that the distance doesn't even factor into the equation, and b) my workplace is on the fringes of downtown, so I miss the worst of the morning traffic. When school's out or there's otherwise no traffic, it takes me about 20 minutes to get to work. On a bad traffic day, 30-45 minutes, tops. Well, once it too me an hour, but that was an extraordinarily bad traffic day.

Now, just to keep this in perspective, this is only driving time. I know folks on the mainland spend far more time commuting to work, which often involves a combination of driving, taking a train, and possibly a bus, taxi or subway ride thrown in for good measure. Hawaii, however, has very limited mass transit. We've got a bus system, but they're as susceptible to the traffic woes as everybody else. We don't have any trains or subways, though there's a big push by our mayor to get a rail system going, with ground breaking taking place in 2009, if he has his way. He's met much opposition, yet this is the closest we've come to actually seeing rail happen.

Also, keep in mind that we're on an island with two mountain chains running along either coast, making it near impossible to go from point A to point B without having to go through or near Honolulu proper, if you want to get to point B in a reasonable amount of time. Otherwise, many areas on this island are bound by the fact that there's only one road in or out, so we don't have much in the way of alternate routes to get around. Building more roads wouldn't solve anything because there's really no place to build any new major roadways here that would alleviate the traffic problem.

Now, I've got mixed feelings on the rail plan. An elevated train running through Honolulu and outlying areas would likely be a blight on the landscape. Hawaii, by law, doesn't allow billboards or planes with banners, so we've got pretty good views, even on the freeway. An elevated rail system would change that. On the other hand, traffic is pretty bad here. It's gotten noticeably worse in the 16+ years I've lived here, and it will only get even worse down the line. Something needs to be done to alleviate the situation somehow.



Also, I should note, that current plans don't have the train connecting to my side of the island, so it's not going to affect my commute at all.

There's also been talk of toll lanes, double-decker freeways, and a whole bunch of other ways to improve the situation, but either they've been shot down or ignored or otherwise they just didn't have any legs. My biggest worry, as the mayor struggles to get his plans finalized, is that he'll meet with last minute opposition or hit some other legal snag, and the plans will have to be scrapped, leaving us with no solution at all. As long as I've lived here, and going back even further, various mayors and public figures have tried to get a rail system going, usually ignoring other alternatives. And each time, their plans got crushed, leaving Honolulu with nothing but a still-growing traffic problem. Like I said, this is the farthest that I've seen such plans advance here, but I don't know what we'll do if this doesn't make it to completion. Alternatives have been scarce, despite the vocal opposition to rail, and besides, the federal funding that's going to help pay for the rail system couldn't be applied to any of the other suggestions that have come up thus far.



There's so much more to this whole rail thing and the back and forth between opposing sides on the issue, way more than I care to get into right now. The short of it is that we've got a traffic problem, and something needs to be done.

-r-

Thursday, June 05, 2008

Poker Faced Spin

From the DailyKOS:
I was imagining what it might be like to play 5-card draw poker with Hillary Clinton:

You: I call.
Hillary: Pair of queens.
You: I have a full house.
Hillary: I'll concede when I see your cards.
You: Read 'em and weep. (shows cards)
Hillary: I will discuss who has won the hand with my supporters.
You: What do you mean, discuss? You lost!
Hillary: I got more queens than anyone at this table.
You: That doesn't matter! The rules don't make the person with
the most queens the winner.
Bill: I have never before seen such disrespect of queens.
Terry: Ladies and gentlemen, the winner of the last poker hand,
Hillary Clinton!
Hillary: Thank-you, Terry. I'm happy to announce that when you include
the cards that I discarded, I actually have two pair and won
the game!
You: You can't include the cards you discarded!
Hillary: I already have. Laying down your 5 cards without the ones you
discarded when you drew was YOUR decision.
You: And two pair doesn't beat a full-house anyway!
Bill: Now they are disrespecting queens AND sevens! This full-house
thing is the biggest fairytale I've ever heard.
You: Come on, guys. You can't be going along with this. Tell her
she lost.
Nita: I think Hillary deserves a grace period of a few days to decide
who won the hand.
Bill: You know, Jesse had a full-house too, and he did not win his
hand.
Terry: Hilla-ree! The winnah!!!
Bill: No promises, but Hillary may actualy be willing to accept you
as a co-winner.
You: But she did NOT win!
Erica: That is the most sexist statement I've ever heard.
Bill: This whole game has been rife with sex! I mean sexism.
Chris: You have an obvious queen problem. You can't win without
queens.
You: But I did win! I have a full house!
Hillary: I'm not doing this for me, I just want queens to be respected
... by conceding that I am the winner.
Bill: If Hillary conceded, and then lightning struck you, then we'd
have no winner! She has to stay in for the good of the entire
poker party.
You: Okay, whatever. I'm going to play with John.
Funny... because it's true. Sadly.

Saw Terry on The Daily Show the other night... The guy is a psycho. I've seen him on a bunch of shouting pundit shows during the campaign, and he fits right in with that crowd, as delusional and rabid as his statements tend to be... But one on one with John Stewart was interesting... Couldn't tell how much of it was Terry having fun with his own image (Stewart started the segment with a bunch of clips of Terry doing the round on the news shows, ending with John calling him cuckoo, only to turn and see Terry right next to him), and how much was him being sincere, but either way, one on one he came across as even less in touch than he did before... I could almost (almost) admire his tenacity in the face of obvious defeat, but there was something unhinged in his look and mannerisms that put me off. The type of guy you'd almost (almost!) want on your own team because he'd spin the fuck out of anything to your advantage, yet that unhinged factor makes you hope the other team will pick him first.

The latest I heard on NPR this morning is that on Saturday, Hillary will "suspend" her campaign (not concede, not end... they noted the careful phrasing on her part), and she will hold on to her delegates while her campaign considers their strategy and how best to move forward... Yet, while remaining committed to party unity and supporting (not endorsing!) Obama.

With all that nuanced wording and mixed messages, I'm really, really happy that she won't be our president... Though it sounds like they haven't fully given up hope on that yet... It's almost like Bill's "define sexual relations" headgame...

Also heard that Rezko was found guilty and that people are thinking this will mean trouble for Obama. To that I say "look at McCain's record." Keating Five, anyone??? Or how about all the lobbyists that have resigned/been let go in recent weeks, despite McCain's supposed stance on lobbyists? There's nothing at all to the Rezko/Obama connection, but even if there were, it would be foolish for McCain to start pointing fingers as his are still quite dirty...

-r-

Tuesday, June 03, 2008

Really...? Can it be true?

From the Associated Press:

WASHINGTON - Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois sealed the Democratic presidential nomination Tuesday, a historic step toward his once-improbable goal of becoming the nation's first black president. A defeated Hillary Rodham Clinton maneuvered for the vice presidential spot on his fall ticket.

So is that it? It's finally over and Obama's the Democratic nominee?

Frankly, I'll only believe it's over when I hear Hillary herself state that she's conceding. She's tenacious and a scrapper (not to mention stubborn and delusional), and I've been hearing mixed messages over the last week or two as to whether or not she'd conceding after today's primaries or take this to the convention.

Also from the AP:

His victory had been widely assumed for weeks. But Clinton's declaration of interest in becoming his ticketmate was wholly unexpected.

Unexpected? Come on, the only people who have hyped up the concept of a joint ticket are the media and... wait for it... the Clintons. She and Bill talked about this months ago during their campaign, and the media (and Clinton supporters) have been running with it, bringing it up again every once in awhile when the buzz subsides.

Hillary, listen to me:


Maybe in 2016. Or maybe even in 2012, on the chance you successfully ruined the chances for a Democratic win in November. Don't hate you, don't hate the fact that you're running, don't care whether or not you're a woman, white, rich, poor, whatever, but please, give it up already. There's an election to win.

-r-

Sunday, June 01, 2008

Peripherally related...

...to my previous post about that lost tribe:


Into The Wild is an excellent, excellent movie.

Watch it.

Now.

...

What are you waiting for?

Get moving!

:-)

-r-

Isolated tribe spotted in Brazil

I thought that this was fascinating as hell...

From the BBC:
One of South America's few remaining uncontacted indigenous tribes has been spotted and photographed on the border between Brazil and Peru.

The Brazilian government says it took the images to prove the tribe exists and help protect its land.

The pictures, taken from an aeroplane, show red-painted tribe members brandishing bows and arrows.

More than half the world's 100 uncontacted tribes live in Brazil or Peru, Survival International says.

They also include a few pictures of this tribe, taken from their plane. I can only imagine what these tribesmen are thinking as this huge, loud, metal bird circles them:




There's something eerie about these images, yet they're such a pure, undistilled image of beauty. A civilization completely untouched and uninfluenced by the modern "civilized" world, with, I'd imagine, a total reverence for the natural world which surrounds and sustains them.

We've strayed far from that life, centuries of exploration and technology and excess all but erasing our links to nature. People can't even go camping without their cellphone or a generator to power their televisions and portable stovetops, yet call their experience "roughing it."

I love the outdoors, and here in Hawaii there's no lack of natural beauty to lose yourself in. Of course there's our miles of beaches and crystal clear waters to enjoy, but there's also the lush, green valleys and mountains with cool breezes and flowing streams, as well as the more rocky and arid areas like out at the eastern and western-most points of Oahu, or the volcano on the Big Island.

In fact, just yesterday, Mica and I took a drive up the windward coast and stopped in Punalu'u to lay out by the beach. It was a pleasant day and a nice attempt to get away from it all, letting ourselves get lost in the sounds and textures around us. But try as we might, we couldn't avoid hearing the buzz of speeding cars or completely block out other signs of civilization which ranged from viewing the electrical power lines overhead, or the occasional piece of broken glass or litter. We just can't drive far enough away to lose the influence of humans. Such is life on an island, I suppose, but even on the mainland, you'd have to drive quite a ways before you'd come close to an area that's considered pristine.

Now to bring things full circle, imagine a tribe who's never heard recorded music, never flicked on a light switch, or even a gas lamp, who couldn't give two shits about the current fight for the Democratic nomination or Denise Richards' new show. Most everything in your daily life that matters to you, or at least crosses your mind, is completely alien, and of no value, to this tribe. They don't care about the new iPhone. The housing crisis means nothing to them. And they are probably the better for it.

-r-

"HEY YOU GUYS!"


Have you heard? The Electric Company is coming back to television!!!

From the article:
An update of the classic kids TV series will begin production today with location shots in Gotham's Washington Heights and the Lower East Side. Show will run weekly beginning in January on PBS stations around the country.

Produced by the Sesame Workshop, the series will target 6- to 9-year-olds, with specific goals to improve the reading habits of children. Like the original version, there will be plenty of music and dance numbers to help kids learn.


I used to love this show as a kid. It was part of my morning "Must See TV" routine, which at the time included Sesame Street, Romper Room and Captain Kangaroo. Ahhh, memories...

In fact, I credit this show helping me get into the character of Spider-Man, as he had a regular spot on the show. The Electric Company was also my first exposure to Morgan Freeman, who played the role of Easy Reader, among other characters on the show.

For your viewing pleasure:

Spider-Man vs. The Wall (not to be confused with Pink Floyd's The Wall)



Morgan Freeman as Easy Reader, making the moves on a young Rita Moreno


Morgan Freeman: In my opinion, the smoothest mo-fo in show businss. Sorry all you Samuel Jackson fans.

-r-

Friday, May 23, 2008

A Peek into Hillary's Thought Process

(click on image for larger view)
(swiped from 23/6.com)

-r-

Friday, May 09, 2008

Rant of the Day


Really... what's the point of the soft pack?

Despite the pristine image of the soft pack above, I have never purchased a soft pack that opens so neatly with the cigarettes easily sliding right out. I have never even seen a soft pack in the possession of anyone else that had such an appearance. Look at them, standing up straight in attention, just waiting for someone to easily remove them from their confines (pick me! pick me!!).

The reality is that I buy the soft pack (when told by the clerk that they're all out of the far superior and sturdier flip-top box), remove the plastic wrapper (which is the easiest thing about the soft pack, but only because they have one of those strips that enable you to zip it right off), wrestle with that little square of foil on either side of the strip they slap down across the middle of the pack for a few moments as I try to make an accessible opening that won't let my cigarettes spill out of my pocket. I then find myself struggling to remove a single cigarette from the pack. You really need tweezers, teeny-tiny fingers, or long fingernails to do this well, I'd imagine, since my first few cigarettes tend to have the filters all dinged up due to my struggles to get them out.

Is there a purpose to selling the soft pack? Do some people out there actually prefer soft packs to the box? If so, why? Tell me please, because I'd really like to know. Aside from the difficulty in getting out at least the first few cigarettes, the pack is always open which makes for easy spilling, unless you keep some of the foil on as a make shift lid (I usually keep my cigarettes in my shirt pocket, and have experienced undesired spillage when I bend over if I don't have that aforementioned lid). I'd also imagine that the "always-open-ness" of the soft pack reduces freshness faster, but I can't quote any studies on the matter. The soft pack and box cost the same, they contain the same number of cigarettes, and yet the box is so much easier to open, the cigarettes are easy to remove, the box protects its contents much better than the soft pack could ever hope to, and the thing actually closes, too. A perfect package, right?

So why has the soft pack endured for so long? Is there something I'm missing?

-r-

Wednesday, May 07, 2008

The Real Pac Man

Ahhh, memories of childhood, when eating happy pills to chase away those colorful, evil ghosts wasn't a bad thing...


(tip o' the hat to uncivilsociety.org)

-r-